EMMA AGNES SHEFFER

https://emmasheffer.com:443/files/gimgs/th-53_FOOT-SCAN-4-WEBSIZE_v4.jpg
https://emmasheffer.com:443/files/gimgs/th-53_FOOT-SCAN-8-WEBSIZE_v3.jpg
https://emmasheffer.com:443/files/gimgs/th-53_FOOT-SCAN-7-WEBSIZE_v6.jpg
https://emmasheffer.com:443/files/gimgs/th-53_FOOT-SCAN-2-WEBSIZE_v3.jpg
https://emmasheffer.com:443/files/gimgs/th-53_FOOT-SCAN-6-WEBSIZE_v3.jpg
https://emmasheffer.com:443/files/gimgs/th-53_FOOT-SCAN-1-WEBSIZE_v3.jpg
https://emmasheffer.com:443/files/gimgs/th-53_FOOT-SCAN-3-WEBSIZE_v3.jpg
https://emmasheffer.com:443/files/gimgs/th-53_FOOT-SCAN-5-WEBSIZE_v3.jpg
https://emmasheffer.com:443/files/gimgs/th-53_FOOT-SCAN-9-WEBSIZE_v3.jpg
CAN MACHINES COPY
Emma Sheffer

‘Can Machines Copy’ comprises individually hand-drawn works of the same image.
The show‘s title is derived from the first line of Alan Turning’s essay Computing Machinery and Intelligence;
“I propose to consider the question, ‘Can machines think?’
This should begin with definitions of the meaning of the terms ‘machine’ and ‘think.’”1

Is a perceivable inaccuracy truer than an unperceivable inaccuracy?
‘Can Machines Copy’ considers human action as nothing more than a mechanized process.

1 Turing, A. M. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Mind LIX.236 (1950): 433-60. Print.